EV charging profitability depends on more than utilization rates. While charging success rates improved to 86% in 2025, many operators miss critical ROI drivers. Maximizing First-Time Success Rate (FTR), demand charge optimization, and peak shaving strategies can mean the difference of thousands in monthly profits or losses. Advanced energy management systems enable operators to increase energy consumption for EV charging by up to 60% while maintaining the same demand charge levels.
Beyond the number of chargers deployed, successful EV charging operations are governed by a few key performance indicators (KPIs) that truly determine profitability and customer satisfaction.
Most Charge Point Operators (CPOs) focus on basic metrics like utilization and uptime, but true ROI comes from optimizing hidden profit drivers such as First-Time Success Rate (FTR), demand charge management, and peak optimization. Advanced energy management systems can help CPOs avoid costly electrical infrastructure upgrades and are critical for turning these factors into savings, resulting in more profitable operations.
Beyond Uptime: Why First-Time Success Rate Matters More
FTR is a percentage measurement of drivers who successfully complete charging sessions on their first attempt, capturing the real customer experience and directly impacting network reputation and revenue. Despite overall industry improvements, achieving consistently high FTR rates remains a challenge across the industry. Low FTR results in negative reviews, reduces customer retention, and creates cascading reputational damage that can affect long-term profitability.
J.D. Power research indicates that 60% of charging failures result from broken chargers rather than user error or payment issues. This finding emphasizes that Charge Point Operators can improve their FTR performance through real-time monitoring and predictive analytics that identify maintenance issues before they impact customers. Network operators can stay ahead of maintenance issues by deploying:
- Real-time Performance Tracking: Continuous monitoring identifies declining performance before complete failure
- Predictive Analytics: Machine learning algorithms predict component failures days or weeks in advance
- Automated Alerts: Immediate notifications enable rapid response to emerging issues
- Remote Diagnostics and Maintenance: Resolving problems without dispatching technicians
How much can a single percentage point improvement in First-Time Success Rate add to your monthly revenue?
Each percentage point improvement in FTR converts previously failed attempts into successful, revenue-generating sessions. If you have 1,000 monthly attempts and improve FTR by 1%, you gain 10 additional successful sessions (1,000 × 0.01 = 10).
To calculate the revenue impact of improving your FTR, follow these steps using the example below:
Calculating Your FTR Revenue Impact
To understand the financial implications of improving your FTR, follow this framework using your own network data:
Step 1: Find Your Current FTR Percentage
Example Network:
- Successful first-attempt sessions in a month: 600
- Total charging attempts in a month: 1,000
- Current FTR calculation: 600 ÷ 1,000 = 60% FTR
Your Network:
- Successful first-attempt sessions: _______
- Total charging attempts: _______
- Your FTR: _______ ÷ _______ = _______%
Step 2: Calculate Additional Sessions from 1% Improvement
Example Network:
- Current FTR: 60%
- Improved FTR: 61% (adding 1%)
- Total attempts: 1,000
- New successful sessions: 1,000 × 0.61 = 610 sessions
- Additional sessions gained: 610 – 600 = 10 more sessions per month
Your Network:
- Current FTR: _______%
- Improved FTR: _______% (add 1%)
- Total attempts: _______
- New successful sessions: _______ × _______ = _______
- Additional sessions gained: _______ – _______ = _______
Step 3: Calculate Additional Monthly Revenue
Example Network:
- Additional sessions per month: 10
- Average revenue per session: $29 (€25)
- Additional monthly revenue: 10 × $29 (€25) = $292 (€250) per month
Your Network:
- Additional sessions per month: _______
- Average revenue per session: $/€_______
- Additional monthly revenue: _______ × $/€_______ = $/€ _______ per month
Bottom Line: In this example, improving FTR by a single percentage point from 60% to 61% adds $292 (€250) in monthly revenue. Use your network’s numbers in the blanks above to calculate your specific revenue gain from a 1% FTR improvement.
The Demand Charge Dilemma: Hidden Cost Destroyer
Demand charges, which are billed based on the highest power consumption within a specific interval, typically 15 minutes, can be a hidden and significant cost. Unlike consumption charges that reflect actual energy used, demand charges are based on a single peak. One busy afternoon when multiple vehicles charge simultaneously can set your costs for the entire month.
Leveraging AI and machine learning provides effective solutions to this challenge. Smart charging platforms utilize real-time data to implement intelligent energy management and peak shaving strategies that prevent costly power spikes without compromising service throughput. Advanced energy management systems can increase energy consumption for EV charging by up to 60% while maintaining the same demand charge levels.
The Value of a Saved Kilowatt: Peak Shaving ROI
Peak shaving involves capping power consumption during periods of high demand to avoid costly utility surcharges or exceeding site capacity. This practice delivers immediate financial benefits while enabling higher service levels through intelligent power management.
Load shifting strategies accomplish this through multiple approaches:
- Battery Storage Integration: Energy storage systems provide power during peak demand periods
- Renewable Energy Sources: Solar panels and other renewables reduce grid dependency
- Dynamic Power Modulation: Intelligent systems adjust charging power limits in real-time
- Time-of-Use Optimization: Charging schedules align with lower electricity rates
These strategies allow higher energy sales without requiring expensive infrastructure upgrades, making peak shaving one of the most cost-effective approaches to improving site profitability.
What percentage of your monthly energy costs could be eliminated through dynamic demand charge management?
Industry analysis suggests that well-implemented demand management strategies can reduce total energy costs by 20-40% at typical charging locations.
Demand Charge Impact Analysis
This analysis demonstrates how peak shaving strategies can reduce monthly operating costs while maintaining or even improving service levels for customers. Based on $100/kW annual demand charge rate (€85.70/kW). Actual rates vary by region and utility provider.
Implementation Strategy: Metrics-Driven Optimization
Successful implementation requires a comprehensive metrics-driven approach that addresses multiple optimization areas simultaneously. Modern charging management platforms provide the foundation for this strategy through several key components:
FTR Monitoring and Improvement
Operators can track success rates in real-time across the network to rapidly identify underperforming assets and take immediate corrective action. Advanced analytics pinpoint specific failure patterns related to hardware compatibility, payment processing, or connectivity issues.
Demand Charge Analysis and Reduction
Analyzing historical power peaks reveals opportunities to reduce demand through load shifting, peak shaving, and energy storage integration. Predictive algorithms forecast upcoming demand patterns, enabling operators to manage power proactively rather than reactively.
Time-of-Use Rate Integration
Operators maximize profit margins by aligning charging schedules with utility rate structures while maintaining service availability. Dynamic pricing models incentivize drivers to charge during off-peak hours, naturally smoothing demand curves.
Renewable Energy Prioritization
Operators reduce grid dependency and stabilize long-term energy costs by integrating renewable energy sources like solar panels. Battery storage systems capture excess renewable generation for use during peak periods, maximizing the value of clean energy investments.
Regular performance benchmarking helps operators track optimization progress and spot new opportunities for improvement.
Real-World Results: Proven Performance
The National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s own implementation demonstrates the value of managed EV charging: when expanding from 36 to 108 Level 2 charging stations in their employee parking garage, managed charging limited collective peak demand to 460 kW instead of the potential 720 kW peak. This avoided costly transformer upgrades while still meeting all employee charging needs.
The 260 kW reduction in peak demand represents a 36% decrease. Here’s how this translates to cost savings:
Utilities typically charge between $12 (€10) and $34 (€29) per kilowatt per month for peak demand. Using a 260 kW reduction:
- Low rate ($12/€10 per kW/month): 260 kW × $12 = $3,120 (€2,600) monthly, or $36,400 (€31,200) annually
- High rate ($34/€29 per kW/month): 260 kW × $34 = $8,797 (€7,540) monthly, or $105,560 (€90,480) annually
These savings demonstrate how intelligent load management reduces operating costs without compromising service. The system coordinates charging schedules to avoid simultaneous high-power draws, delivering the same total energy while flattening peak demand.
Key factors that determine your savings potential:
- Peak-to-average ratio: Higher ratios create more optimization opportunities
- Utility rate structure: Demand charge rates vary significantly by region
- Load flexibility: More controllable loads enable greater optimization
Market Perspectives: Regional ROI Drivers
Different regions present unique opportunities and challenges for ROI optimization. In the United States, NEVI requirements place strong emphasis on reliability metrics, making high FTR a competitive advantage that can influence funding eligibility and customer preference.
European markets face EU Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation (AFIR) mandates that increase demand for highly reliable and cost-efficient operations for road vehicles (in addition to vessels and stationary aircraft). These regulatory frameworks create both challenges and opportunities for operators who can demonstrate superior performance metrics.
The International Energy Agency’s 2025 outlook predicts significant infrastructure growth requiring advanced energy management solutions. This growth creates opportunities for operators who can efficiently manage both traditional charging loads and emerging applications like vehicle-to-grid services.
Conclusion: From Cost Centers to Profit Generators
Traditional metrics like uptime and utilization provide only partial visibility into site profitability. The real drivers of ROI are sophisticated metrics like FTR and demand charge management that directly impact both revenue generation and cost control.
Even minor percentage improvements in these areas can lead to significant monthly savings that compound over time. A data-driven approach to energy management transforms maintenance and operations from cost centers into profit generators that support sustainable business growth.
True success comes from implementing holistic strategies that integrate reliability optimization, energy management, and customer experience enhancement. Operators who master these metrics through advanced charging management platforms position themselves for long-term success in the rapidly evolving EV charging market.
The charging industry continues advancing toward greater sophistication in operations management. The operators who invest early in metrics-driven optimization will capture the greatest benefits as competition intensifies and margins become more dependent on operational excellence.
Learn more about comprehensive metrics tracking and optimization at Driivz’s smart energy management platform
Currency conversions use the exchange rate of €1 = $1.1667 USD
